In particular, we generalize the concept of witness sets - the key to lower-bounding the optimum - by proposing novel global witness set structures and completely new ways of adaptively using those. But L is itself a vertex cover since the graph is bipartite. Therefore the vertex cover chosen is C R. Then it picks an edge out of Rr1, again choosing its end-point inR for the cover C and, so on. Transmission range of node 1 is shown with a dotted circle. Rr rst, choosing the end-point in R as the vertex to be placed in the cover. To obtain our results, we provide new structural insights for the minimum spanning tree problem that might be useful in the context of query-based algorithms regardless of predictions. In single-hop transmission mode, node 1 can only send message to nodes 0, 2 and 3 in Figure 2.1. A vertex cover of a graph can also more simply be thought of as a set of vertices of such that every edge of has at least one of member of as an endpoint. Our results demonstrate that untrusted predictions can circumvent the known lower bound of~2, without any degradation of the worst-case ratio. Thus the total weight in the vertex cover canbeexpressedbyZ. v 1 if it is in the vertex cover otherwise v 0. One way to model an internet is using an undirected graph in which vertices represent nodes, and edges represent connections between the nodes. 1-hop neighborhood, which will limit solution efficiency. The output of the program expresses the vertex v is in the vertex cover or not. We also show that the predictions are PAC-learnable in our model. Weighted vertex cover (WVC) is one of the most important combinatorial optimization problems. Furthermore, we argue that a suitably defined hop distance is a useful measure for the amount of prediction error and design algorithms with performance guarantees that degrade smoothly with the hop distance. Moreover, we show that this trade-off is best possible. Branch-and-reduce exponential/fpt algorithms in practice: A case study of vertex cover. For all integral γ≥2, we present algorithms that are γ-robust and (1+1γ)-consistent, meaning that they use at most γOPT queries if the predictions are arbitrarily wrong and at most (1+1γ)OPT queries if the predictions are correct, where OPT is the optimal number of queries for the given instance. Our aim is to minimize the number of queries needed to solve the minimum spanning tree problem, a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem that has been central also to the research area of explorable uncertainty. We study how to utilize (possibly erroneous) predictions in a model for computing under uncertainty in which an algorithm can query unknown data.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |